Jujube is not one interchangeable trade item. Chinese jujube, Ziziphus jujuba, and Indian jujube, Ziziphus mauritiana, have separate Codex identities, while fresh fruit, dried red jujubes, planting material, powder and extract require different specifications and regulatory evidence. Atlas fixes species, form, origin, destination, lot and delivery terms before comparing offers.
Codex classifies Indian jujube and Chinese jujube separately as FT 0301 and FT 0302. ISO 6900:2025 applies specifically to dried red jujubes of Ziziphus jujuba, so its scope cannot be transferred to fresh fruit or Indian jujube. Australia's reviewed fresh-Chinese-jujube pathway assessed eight associated pests—seven quarantine pests and one regulated article—including four fruit-fly species—and current access requires a valid import permit and compliance with BICON conditions. Those counts describe one origin-destination pathway; they are not a universal risk score, lot certificate, supply measure or price.
The Codex commodity classification assigns Indian jujube, Ziziphus mauritiana, and Chinese jujube, Ziziphus jujuba, separate codes. Kew's current botanical records likewise accept both as distinct species. Atlas preserves the scientific name, cultivar, crop and harvest dates and seller's common name; the words jujube, red date or ber alone do not establish species, origin or a comparable product.
ISO 6900:2025 is explicitly limited to dried red jujubes of Ziziphus jujuba. Australia's reviewed pathway is explicitly for fresh Chinese jujube fruit for human consumption and does not cover planting or animal-feed uses. Atlas keeps species, fresh or dried condition, whole, pitted, sliced, powdered or extracted form, moisture basis, intended use, processing, additives, package and lot evidence attached to the record.
Australia's current China-to-Australia fresh-fruit pathway requires an import permit and origin- and pest-management conditions recorded in BICON. The risk review names the pests and the management options behind that decision. Atlas records the origin, registered production and packing evidence where applicable, treatment, phytosanitary certificate, permit, destination, inspection status and evidence date. It does not generalize one country's market-access decision to another route or lot.
Species classification, a dried-product standard and a biosecurity pathway cannot establish cultivar, size, maturity, soluble solids, firmness, moisture, defects, residues, treatment outcome, package condition, current availability, freight or destination cost for an offer. A delivered comparison still needs current permitted observations for the exact species, form, grade, lot, origin, quantity, currency, Incoterm, destination, delivery window, route costs and information vintage. Atlas withholds a physical estimate when those observations or usage rights are missing.
No. Codex lists Chinese jujube as Ziziphus jujuba under FT 0302 and Indian jujube as Ziziphus mauritiana under FT 0301. Atlas keeps the scientific name with each lot.
No. The ISO catalog states that it specifies requirements and test methods for dried red jujubes of Ziziphus jujuba. Fresh fruit, Indian jujube, planting material, powder and extract require their own evidence.
No. It is a China-to-Australia pathway for fresh fruit for human consumption, subject to a valid permit and current BICON conditions. It cannot be transferred to another origin, destination, product form or end use.
Scientific name and cultivar, fresh or dried condition, whole, pitted, sliced, powdered or extracted form, crop and packing dates, size and maturity, soluble solids or moisture where applicable, defects, food-safety and residue evidence, treatment, package and lot, origin, quantity, currency, Incoterm, destination, delivery window and evidence date.
Figures retain their source, period and review date. Corroboration is not promoted to primary evidence.