Pine Nuts

Pine nuts are edible kernels from identified Pinus species; species, shell state, processing, grade and destination determine whether two lots are comparable. A trade record should retain the botanical species, crop year, origin and harvest zone, inshell or kernel form, peeled or unpeeled state, raw, roasted, salted, flavoured or industrial use, UNECE class and size count where claimed, moisture, broken and defective kernels, rancidity, pests, mould, aflatoxin and other contaminant results, allergen and cross-contact controls, package and lot, quantity, currency, Incoterm, destination, delivery window and information vintage.

Editorial evidence reviewedReviewed 2026-09-18Release 2026-09-19-batch-230
Market value
$1.2B
Producing countries tracked
9
Grading systems
1
Active supply risks
3
Trade corridors
3
Latest reviewed evidence

UNECE DDP-12 defines commercial-quality controls for direct-consumption pine nut kernels and keeps species explicit. Its 2025 aligned text sets a general moisture ceiling of 3.5 percent, with species-specific ceilings of 6.0 percent for Pinus pinea and 7.0 percent for Pinus gerardiana, and classifies kernels as Extra, Class I or Class II. Codex CXC 59-2005 covers aflatoxin prevention across tree nuts, including Pinus species, through agricultural, manufacturing and storage controls. These are reference controls—not proof of a lot's species, class, safety, destination compliance, availability or current physical price.

UNECE general pine-nut-kernel moisture ceiling
3.5
percent moisture, maximum · UNECE DDP-12 aligned text, 2025
UNECE Pinus pinea moisture ceiling
6
percent moisture, maximum · UNECE DDP-12 aligned text, 2025
UNECE Pinus gerardiana moisture ceiling
7
percent moisture, maximum · UNECE DDP-12 aligned text, 2025
UNECE Pinus pinea and Pinus gerardiana lower size band
600
kernels per 100 grams, lower bound · UNECE DDP-12 aligned text, 2025
EU aflatoxin B1 ceiling for other tree nuts placed on the final-consumer market
2
micrograms per kilogram, maximum · EU Regulation 2023/915 consolidated 2025-10-08, category 1.1.7
EU total-aflatoxin ceiling for other tree nuts placed on the final-consumer market
4
micrograms per kilogram, maximum · EU Regulation 2023/915 consolidated 2025-10-08, category 1.1.7

Pinus species is a commercial identity field

UNECE DDP-12 names multiple Pinus species for direct-consumption kernels and excludes Pinus armandii and Pinus massoniana from the 2013 standard. The 2025 aligned text updates the named scope and sizing table. Atlas records the exact species or an honestly unresolved species claim, because shape, count, moisture allowance, origin convention and buyer specification cannot safely be transferred across every product called pine nut.

Inshell nuts, kernels and processed products stay separate

Inshell cones or nuts, decorticated kernels, peeled kernels and broken pieces are different forms. Roasted, salted, sugared, flavoured or industrial-processing products also fall outside the direct-consumption kernel scope of DDP-12. Atlas retains shelling, peeling, thermal treatment, ingredients, intended use and yield rather than converting between forms without a documented basis.

Class and size claims require the UNECE lot basis

DDP-12 uses Extra, Class I and Class II and permits size determination by kernel count per unit weight, with species-specific bands. A class or count claim belongs to the sampled lot and applicable standard edition. Atlas retains species, class, count method, sample plan, tolerance results, package, lot and inspection date rather than treating a marketing adjective such as premium or large as a grade.

Moisture, defects and rancidity are different controls

The UNECE moisture ceilings are species-sensitive, while minimum quality also addresses soundness, visible foreign matter, development, pests, mould, rancidity, abnormal moisture, smell and taste. Broken kernels, shrivelling, blemishes, germination and foreign material require their own defect counts. A moisture result alone does not certify keeping quality or conformity.

Aflatoxin prevention does not replace lot testing

Codex CXC 59-2005 applies preventive agricultural, manufacturing and storage practices to tree nuts including Pinus species. Destination limits then depend on product state and use. For example, the consolidated EU contaminant rule distinguishes tree nuts for further sorting from those placed on the final-consumer market. Atlas retains laboratory, method, analytes, limit of quantification, sample plan, result, date and exact lot; a supplier program or country reputation is not a certificate.

Allergen and cross-contact evidence is destination-specific

U.S. FDA guidance requires the applicable tree-nut type to be identified when a listed major tree-nut allergen is used and requires controls against undeclared allergen cross-contact. Other destinations may classify and label pine kernels differently. Atlas therefore records destination law, ingredient statement, species naming, shared-line controls and analytical evidence where relevant instead of asserting one universal label treatment.

Origin and chain of custody remain claim-specific

Country of harvest, forest or plantation system, processor location and shipping origin are not interchangeable. Organic, sustainability, wild-harvest, geographic-origin and custody claims each require their own standard, certificate scope, transaction document and valid dates. Atlas does not infer them from species, exporter address or packaging art.

A quality standard does not establish a delivered pine-nut price

Species, form, grade, size and contaminant limits do not establish current availability, lot conformity, transaction value or delivered cost. A physical estimate still needs permitted current observations for the exact species and product form, quality and safety evidence, crop year, origin and processor, package and lot, quantity, currency, Incoterm, load and destination points, delivery window, freight, duties and information vintage. Atlas withholds a physical estimate when those observations or usage rights are missing.

Questions procurement teams ask

Are all pine nuts commercially interchangeable?

No. Species, origin, kernel form, grade, size count, moisture allowance, crop year, processing and destination requirements can differ. The exact lot specification must be retained.

Does an Extra, Class I or Class II claim prove the lot complies?

No. The claim must be supported by the applicable UNECE edition, representative sampling, species-sensitive sizing and moisture results, defect tolerances, package and lot identity and inspection date.

Does a supplier aflatoxin-control program replace a laboratory result?

No. Preventive controls reduce risk; destination compliance depends on a representative lot result, the applicable product category, analytes, method and date.

Can an inshell-nut price be compared directly with a kernel offer?

Not without shelling yield, usable-kernel recovery, defects, processing costs and matching Incoterm, destination, quantity and delivery window. They are different product forms.

Which fields make pine-nut offers comparable?

Pinus species, crop year, harvest origin, inshell or kernel form, peeled and processing state, UNECE class and size count, moisture, broken and defective kernels, rancidity, pests and mould, aflatoxin and other contaminant results, allergen and cross-contact controls, package and lot, quantity, currency, Incoterm, destination, delivery window and evidence date.

Sources and provenance

Figures retain their source, period and review date. Corroboration is not promoted to primary evidence.

ECE/CTCS/WP.7/GE.2/2025/10 — Standard for Pine Nut Kernels (DDP-12 aligned text)
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe · Primary UN working text for commercial-quality control, species scope, classes, sizing, moisture and defect tolerances; it is not a lot inspection or safety certificate · accessed 2026-09-18
CXC 59-2005 — Code of Practice for the Prevention and Reduction of Aflatoxin Contamination in Tree Nuts
Codex Alimentarius Commission, FAO/WHO · Primary international code covering preventive aflatoxin controls for tree nuts including Pinus species; it does not certify a shipment or replace destination limits and lot testing · accessed 2026-09-18
Food Allergies — U.S. allergen labeling and cross-contact controls
U.S. Food and Drug Administration · Primary U.S. regulator guidance on major-food-allergen labeling, tree-nut naming and cross-contact; the exact current FDA tree-nut list and destination rule govern · accessed 2026-09-18
Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 — Maximum levels for certain contaminants in food, consolidated 8 October 2025
European Union · Primary EU law distinguishing tree nuts for further sorting from final-consumer or ingredient use and setting aflatoxin B1 and total-aflatoxin limits; exact category and current consolidation govern · accessed 2026-09-18
Grading systems
View →
National and regional grading frameworks defining tradeable quality.
Producers
View →
Country-level production, share of global output, exporter/importer status.
Supply risks
View →
Active and seasonal supply-side risks — weather, disease, geopolitical, regulatory.
Documentation
View →
Required export and import documents per origin-destination corridor.